• Home
  • IDEAS
  • GROUPS
    • Classical German Philosophy and Phenomenology
    • The quarrel between the ancients and moderns
    • The quarrel between philosophy and poetry
    • Theories of Emotions
    • Philosophies of Image and Imagination
    • Utopia, the Political Myth, and Rebellion
    • The Philosophy of Nature
  • EVENTS
  • PEOPLE
  • ADMISSION
  • CONTACTS
  • CONFERENCES
    • 2016
      • Il tragico nella letteratura tedesca
      • Dialectic and the Ends of Reason
        • Schedule
    • 2015
      • CONVEGNO MELANCOLIA
        • Introduction
        • Schedule
      • CONFERENCE ON THE ANCIENTS
        • Introduction
        • Schedule
      • Immaginazione e Giudizio In Kant
        • Schedule
    • 2014
      • Hegel and the phenomenological movement
  • ODRADEK Journal

Tag Archives: philosophy

Call for Papers: Il pensiero politico di Wilhelm von Humboldt

07 Friday Sep 2018

Posted by Stella Ammaturo in CFA-CFP, Odradek

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

aesthetics, antropologia filosofica, Ästhetik, call for papers, critica letteraria, estetica, filosofia, filosofia del linguaggio, filosofia politica, Geschichte, Giovanni Cogliandro, History, Isabella Ferron, Language study, Marco Ivaldo, Odradek, Odradek rivista online, philosophical Anthropology, Philosophie, philosophischer Anthropologie, philosophy, Religion, religione, Sprachstudium, storia, Stuart Mill, studio del linguaggio, Wilhelm von Humboldt

Versione italiana

La persona e il pensiero di Wilhelm von Humboldt (1787-1835) continuano ad affascinare e a essere oggetto di studio da parte di studiosi che appartengono a diverse discipline, dalla filosofia alla linguistica, dalla critica letteraria all’antropologia filosofica. A livello italiano ne sono testimonianza le numerose pubblicazioni, tra le quali si cita l’ultima in ordine di tempo, ossia la curatela edita da Carrano, Massimilla e Tessitore, Wilhelm von Humboldt, duecentocinquant’anni dopo. Incontri e confronti (Liguori 2017).

Punto di partenza e fulcro delle seguenti riflessioni è lo studio e l’analisi del pensiero politico di Wilhelm von Humboldt, che risulta particolarmente interessante, estremamente innovativo per la sua epoca ed estremamente attuale per quello che riguarda la riflessione sul ruolo dello Stato, sui concetti di individuo e individualità e sul ruolo della diversità umana.

Le prime riflessioni politiche di Humboldt risalgono agli anni 1791-92; le opere di questo periodo, Ideen über Staatsverfassung (1791) e Ideen zu einem bestimmten Versuch, die Gränzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen (1792), saranno pubblicate postume e permettono di ripercorrere a ritroso la genesi e lo sviluppo del suo pensiero politico. Tuttavia, le sue meditazioni sono presenti e rappresentano una sorta di filo rosso che uniscono le opere che trattano di critica letteraria (Ästhetische Versuche. Erster Theil. Über Göthe’s Herrmann und Dorothea. Braunschweig [1799]; Über Schiller und den Gang seiner Geistesentwicklung [1830]), dello studio delle lingue e del funzionamento del linguaggio (Pindars „Olympische Oden“. Übersetzung aus dem Griechischen [1816]; Aischylos’ „Agamemnon“. Übersetzung aus dem Griechischen [1816]; Über das vergleichende Sprachstudium in Beziehung auf die verschiedenen Epochen der Sprachentwicklung [1820]), di antropologia (Über den Geschlechtsunterschied und dessen Einfluss auf die organische Natur [1794]; Über männliche und weibliche Form [1795]; Plan einer vergleichenden Anthropologie [1797]) etc.

Per analizzare approfonditamente la genesi e lo sviluppo delle idee politiche humboldtiane, possibili tematiche sono le seguenti proposte che individuano il rapporto tra la riflessione politica e:

  1. l’antropologia filosofica;
  2. l’estetica;
  3. la storia;
  4. la religione;
  5. lo studio del linguaggio;
  6. la filosofia.

Rappresentano gli elementi focali della riflessione humboldtiana che possono essere analizzati da molteplici punti di vista e attraverso metodi e correnti di pensiero diverse. Non si tratta di individuare le possibili relazioni tra le tematiche e i nuclei di pensiero proposti solo in riferimento all’epoca in cui visse Humboldt. Tracce del suo pensiero, anche se mediate e indirette, si possono trovare, ad esempio, in autori e pensatori a lui posteriri, si pensi a Stuart Mill che cita il saggio Ideen zu einem bestimmten Versuch, die Graenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen nella prefazione al suo On Liberty (1859), o all’interpretazione chomskiana delle sue idee linguistiche (cfr. gli universali linguistici e l’idea di struttura applicata al linguaggio).

Il numero monografico della rivista dedicato al pensiero politico humboldtiano accoglie pertanto contributi che si prefiggono lo scopo di analizzare questi nessi e altri possibili da un punto di vista transdisciplinare, comparatistico.

Gli abstracts di 250-300 parole dovranno essere inviati entro il 30 novembre 2018 ai curatori Giovanni Cogliandro (cogliandro@gmail.com), Isabella Ferron (isabella.ferron@unipd.it) e Marco Ivaldo (marco.ivaldo@unina.it). Entro il 31 dicembre 2018 i curatori selezioneranno i contributi pubblicabili sulla base degli abstracts pervenuti.

 

I contributi, che non dovranno superare le 40 mila battute (incluse note e riferimenti) e saranno sottoposti a peer review, dovranno pervenire entro il 30 aprile 2019.

I contributi saranno consegnati online via OJS – Open Journal System:

http://zetesis.cfs.unipi.it/Rivista/index.php/odradek/index

Le linee guida per la consegna si trovano al link seguente:

http://zetesis.cfs.unipi.it/Rivista/index.php/odradek/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions

Tutti i contributi saranno esaminati e recensiti secondo le nostre procedure

http://zetesis.cfs.unipi.it/Rivista/index.php/odradek/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess

 

Lingue: Inglese, Italiano, Tedesco.

 

English version

Wilhelm von Humboldt’s political Thought

Wilhelm von Humboldt (1787-1835) as a person, and his ideas, still fascinate scholars from different disciplines, from Philosophy, to Linguistics or philosophical Anthropology, and are objects of their research. In the Italian scientific panorama new publications and studies testify this constant interest for the work of Humboldt, which has never been abandoned, as for instance the edition of Carrano, Massimilla e Tessitore, Wilhelm von Humboldt, duecentocinquant’anni dopo. Incontri e confronti (Liguori 2017).

The starting point of the following reflection is the analysis of Humboldt’s political thought, that is particularly interesting, as it is timely, innovative and extremely topical and refers to his idea of the role of the State in people’s lives, and the concepts of individuality and human diversity.

His first political ideas go back to 1791-92; however his works Ideen über Staatsverfassung (1791) and Ideen zu einem bestimmten Versuch, die Graenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen (1792) were published posthumously. They are very important as they help us to understand the genesis and the development of his ideas, and so interpret them. Humboldt’s political reflections draw a red line that fit his works, whether they deal with literary critics (Ästhetische Versuche. Erster Theil. Über Göthe’s Herrmann und Dorothea. Braunschweig [1799]; Über Schiller und den Gang seiner Geistesentwicklung [1830]), or with the study of languages (Pindars „Olympische Oden“ [1816]; Aischylos’ „Agamemnon“ [1816]; Über das vergleichende Sprachstudium in Beziehung auf die verschiedenen Epochen der Sprachentwicklung [1820]), with Anthopology (Über den Geschlechtsunterschied und dessen Einfluss auf die organische Natur [1794]; Über männliche und weibliche Form [1795]; Plan einer vergleichenden Anthropologie [1797]) and so on.

Possible themes for a precise and deep analysis refer to the relationship between political thought and:

  1. philosophical Anthropology;
  2. Aesthetics;
  3. History;
  4. Religion;
  5. Language study (Linguistics, Historical Linguistics);
  6. Philosophy

These themes represent the main aspects of Humboldt’s ideas and can be analyzed under different scientific points of view, with different methods and ways of thinking. It is not only a question of its development during Humboldt’s era, but also the call for papers aims at finding possible traces of Humboldt’s work in different periods of time and in particular authors, as for instance Stuart Mill, who cited Humboldt’s Ideen zu einem bestimmten Versuch, die Graenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen in his Preface to On Liberty (1859), or Noam Chomsky, whose linguistic theories developed Humboldt’s ideas on Language and Languages (linguistic universals, the idea of a language structure etc.) in new ways. The monographic issue on Humboldt’s political ideas searches for proposals and contributions that try to analyse it from a cross-cultural and comparative perspective. Contributions from the different disciplines that are involved in this reflection are welcome.

An abstract of 250-300 words must be sent by 30 November 2018 to editors email addresses: Giovanni Cogliandro (cogliandro@gmail.com ), Isabella Ferron (isabella.ferron@unipd.it)and Marco Ivaldo (marco.ivaldo@unina.it). Notification of acceptance will be sent by 31 December 2018.

Full papers of accepted abstracts cannot be longer than 40 000 characters (footnote and references included). They should be submitted by 30 April 2019 and prepared for blind peer review.

The full paper must be submitted online via OJS – Open Journal System:

http://zetesis.cfs.unipi.it/Rivista/index.php/odradek/index

Authors can find submission guidelines at the following link:

http://zetesis.cfs.unipi.it/Rivista/index.php/odradek/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions

All papers will be reviewed according to our peer review process policy:

http://zetesis.cfs.unipi.it/Rivista/index.php/odradek/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess

Languages: English, German, Italian.

 

Deutsche version

Wilhelm von Humboldts politisches Denken

Die Faszination für die Figur und das Denken Wilhelm von Humboldts (1787-1835) ist nach wie vor ungebrochen; noch heute sind sie Forschungsobjekte von Wissenschaftlern der verschiedensten Disziplinen, sei es Philosophie, Linguistik oder philosophische Anthropologie. In der italienischen Forschungslandschaft wird dieses beständige Interesse durch zahlreiche Publikationen bezeugt, z.B. die kürzlich erschienene Herausgeberschaft von Carrano, Massimilla und Tessitore, Wilhelm von Humboldt, duecentocinquant’anni dopo. Incontri e confronti (Liguori 2017).

Ausgangspunkt der folgenden Überlegungen ist eine Analyse von Humboldts politischem Denken. Diesem gebührt besonderes Interesse, da es einerseits für seine Epoche innovativ war und andererseits für das Nachdenken über die Rolle des Staates, den Begriff des Individuums und der menschlichen Diversität auch heute noch hochaktuell ist.

Seine ersten politischen Überlegungen gehen auf die Jahre 1791-92 zurück, jedoch sind die Werke Ideen über Staatsverfassung (1791) und Ideen zu einem bestimmten Versuch, die Gränzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen (1792) erst posthum veröffentlicht worden. Sie erlauben uns, rückblickend die Genese und die Entwicklung seines Denkens zu verstehen und zu deuten. Humboldts politische Reflexionen können als roter Faden begriffen werden, der seine Werke miteinander verbindet: sowohl die, welche die Literaturkritik betreffen (Ästhetische Versuche. Erster Theil. Über Göthe’s Herrmann und Dorothea. [1799]; Über Schiller und den Gang seiner Geistesentwicklung [1830]), diejenigen, die sich mit dem Sprachstudium (Pindars „Olympische Oden“. Übersetzung aus dem Griechischen [1816]; Aischylos’ „Agamemnon“. Übersetzung aus dem Griechischen [1816]; Über das vergleichende Sprachstudium in Beziehung auf die verschiedenen Epochen der Sprachentwicklung [1820]), mit der Anthropologie (Über den Geschlechtsunterschied und dessen Einfluss auf die organische Natur [1794]; Über männliche und weibliche Form [1795]; Plan einer vergleichenden Anthropologie [1797]) oder anderem befassen.

Mögliche Themen für eine präzise und genauere Untersuchung beziehen sich auf das Verhältnis zwischen Humboldts politischem Denken und

  1. philosophischer Anthropologie;
  2. Ästhetik;
  3. Geschichte;
  4. Religion;
  5. Sprachstudium;
  6. Philosophie.

Diese Gebiete stellen die zentralen Aspekte der Humboldt’schen Gedankenwelt dar und können aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven und mithilfe verschiedener Methoden und Denkweisen betrachtet werden. Es geht nicht nur darum, die möglichen Beziehungen zwischen dieser Themen mit Bezug auf Humboldts Epoche zu untersuchen, sondern auch darum, Spuren seines Denkens (mittelbar und unmittelbar) in Philosophen und Denkern anderer Zeiten wahrzunehmen – man denke etwa an John Stuart Mill, der in der Einleitung zu On Liberty (1859) Humboldts Ideen zu einem bestimmten Versuch, die Gränzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen erwähnt, oder an Noam Chomskys Interpretation von Humboldts Sprachauffassung (vgl. das Verständnis von sprachlichen Universalien und die Idee von Struktur, die er auf die Sprache appliziert).

Für das monographische Heft über Humboldts politisches Denken werden Beiträge angenommen, die obengenannte Themen und deren Beziehungen zueinander aus einer inter- und transdisziplinären wie auch komparatistischen Perspektive beleuchten.

 

Interessierte werden gebeten, ein kurzes Abstract in Deutsch (ca. 250-300 Wörter, exkl. Literaturhinweise) bis einschließlich 30.11.2018 an Giovanni Cogliandro (cogliandro@gmail.com ), Isabella Ferron (isabella.ferron@unipd.it) und Marco Ivaldo (marco.ivaldo@unina.it) zu mailen. Eine Benachrichtigung über die Annahme des Beitrags wird bis zum 31.12.2018 erfolgen.

Die Zusendung der fertigen Aufsätze, die einen Umfang von 40.000 Zeichen (inklusiv Fußnoten und Bibliographie) nicht überschreiten und einer beiderseits anonymen Begutachtung unterzogen werden sollen, erwarten wir bis zum 30.04.2019.

Die fertigen Aufsätze müssen online via OJS – Open Journal System eingereicht werden: http://zetesis.cfs.unipi.it/Rivista/index.php/odradek/index

Weitere Informationen: http://zetesis.cfs.unipi.it/Rivista/index.php/odradek/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions

Alle Aufsätze werden gemäß dem peer review Verfahren begutachtet:

will be reviewed according to our policy:

http://zetesis.cfs.unipi.it/Rivista/index.php/odradek/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess

Sprachen: Englisch, Deutsch und Italienisch

 

Wilhelm von Humboldts Werke

Gesammelte Schriften. Ausgabe der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, hrsg. v. Albert Leitzmann, Berlin 1903–1936, Nachdruck 1968.

Wilhelm von Humboldt. Werke in fünf Bänden. Hrsg. v. Andrea Flitner und Klaus Giel, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt 1980ff.

Schriften zur Sprachwissenschaft. Hrsg. v. Kurt Mueller-Vollmer, Tilman Borsche, Bernhard Hurch, Jürgen Trabant und Gordon Whittaker. Betreut durch die Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh 1994ff.

Sekundärbibliographie (Auswahl)

Aneziris, Christos G., Zur 250. Wiederkehr des Geburtstags von Wilhelm von Humboldt, Mannheim, Humboldt-Gesellschaft für Wissenschaft, Kunst und Bildung e.V. 2017.

Carrano, Antonio/ Tessitore, Fulvio et al. (a cura di), Wilhelm von Humboldt, duecentocinquant’anni dopo, Napoli, Liguori 2017.

Caussat, Pierre; Variations philosophiques et sémiotiques autour du langage: Humboldt, Saussure, Bakhtin, Jakobson, Ricoeur et quelques autres, Louvain-la-Neuve, Academia-l’Harmattan 2016.

Denat, Céline, Transferts linguistiques, hybridations culturelles, Reims, Éditions et presses universitaires de Reims 2015.

Halász, Hajnalka, Differenzen des Sprachdenkens: Jakobson, Luhmann, Humboldt, Gadamer und Heidegger, Bielefeld, transcript 2017.

Maurer, Michael, Wilhelm von Humboldt: Ein Leben als Werk, Köln, Böhlau 2016.

Mendicino, Kristina, Prophecies of Language: The confusion of Tongues in German Romanticism, New York, Fordham University Press 2017.

Nolte, Dorothee, Wilhelm von Humboldt: Ein Lebensbild in Anedokten, Berlin, Eulenspiegel Verlag 2017.

Palumbo, Ciro, Stato, diritto e linguaggio giuridico: Studi con von Humboldt, Roma, Nuova Cultura 2015.

Petersen, Jens, Wilhelm von Humboldts Rechtsphilosophie, Berlin, De Gruyter 2016.

Rosenstrauch, Hazel, Wahlverwandt und ebenbürtig: Caroline und Wilhelm von Humboldt, Berlin, AB – Die Andere Bibliothek GmbH & Co. KG 2017.

Weber, Philipp, Kosmos und Subjektivität in der Frühromantik, Paderborn, Fink 2017.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Print
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like Loading...

Una firma per Zetesis (riservato a iscritti all’Università di Pisa)

22 Tuesday Nov 2016

Posted by Danilo Manca in Senza categoria

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

philosophy, Università di Pisa, Zetesis

Anche quest’anno Zetesis chiede a tutti gli iscritti all’Università di Pisa una firma a sostegno delle attività che ha programmato il 2017.

Se volete aiutarci a ottenere il piccolo finanziamento da parte del Consiglio degli studenti che ci permette di portare avanti i nostri progetti di conferenze, seminari, e di realizzare le pubblicazioni che gratuitamente ogni anno distribuiamo, la procedura è la seguente:

1. andare sul seguente portale http://attivitastudentesche.adm.unipi.it/,
2. entrare con le proprie credenziali del portale Alice
3. cliccare sulla voce a lato sinistro Adesioni (a volte esce automaticamente la facciata delle adesioni)

4. Selezionare la categoria di attività, ovvero nel caso delle attività di Zetesis, le opzioni sono:
1. “Pubblicazioni, riviste, giornali”
2. oppure “Conferenze, seminari, mostre”

5. Selezionare l’attività a cui si vuole aderire ovvero:

– se si è scelta l’opzione 1 si può scegliere una fra le seguenti attività:
Stampa e confezione relazioni Laboratorio teoria delle emozioni (RIF. 1521)
Stampa e confezione relazioni Laboratorio di fenomenologia dell’arte (RIF. 1522)
Stampa relazioni Laboratorio sul problema della storia (RIF. 1526)

– se si è scelta l’opzione 2 si può scegliere una fra le seguenti attività
Conferenza sul tragico e la filosofia (RIF. 1518)
La leggibilità della natura (RIF. 1523)
Conferenza sul metodo della filosofia e il concetto di mondo in Kant (RIF. 1524)

6. infine, cliccare sul tasto “Conferma” 
 
MI RACCOMANDO SE NON SI CLICCA SUL TASTO CONFERMA VIENE TUTTO VANIFICATO

Per qualsiasi chiarimento o difficoltà potete scriverci a zetesis@unipi.it
Grazie!

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Print
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like Loading...

CFP Emotion and Cognition

03 Friday Jun 2016

Posted by Danilo Manca in CFA-CFP

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Andrea Lavazza, behavioral economics, cognition, emotion, Hume, Kant, moral emotion, morality, neuroeconomics, neuroethics, passion, pathology, philosophy, psychology, Rivista Filosofia e Psicologia

Segnaliamo con piacere il seguente call for papers della RiFP – Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia:

 

Emotions and Cognition: Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience in Dialogue

 

What is an emotion? What is the relationship between emotion and cognition? How can one best articulate the distinction, if there is one, between cognition and emotion? What is the function of emotion with respect to cognition? And what contribution can neuroscience make to our understanding of emotions and the relationship between cognition and emotion? These are just a few of the key questions addressed by those philosophers, psychologists and neuroscientists who investigate emotional experience.

RiFP – Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia, with the support of SINe – Società italiana di Neuroetica e Filosofia delle Neuroscienze, seeks to promote a broad interdisciplinary discussion on these themes for the first issue in 2017. RIFP and SINe invite all scholars who wish to contribute to this discussion to send original manuscripts on the relationship between emotion and cognition, from a theoretical and/or empirical and/or historical approach. The sub-themes of the present call for papers include, but are not limited to:

 

(a) work that focuses, including from a historical perspective, on the relationship between emotions and knowledge, by defining the possible differences between, or identity of, emotional experiences and cognitive processes. The relationship between emotion and reason has a complex and well-articulated history that has developed around two main perspectives: a Humean perspective that assigns an important role to the “passions”, and a Kantian perspective that, in contrast, downplays the emotions privileging the role of “disembodied” thought. That the emotions play a fundamental role in psychic life and mental processes no matter how the latter are defined, is today considered beyond doubt. Contemporary discussion instead focusses on the nature of the relationship between emotions and cognition in various circumstances. We are especially interested in contributions which provide a diachronic perspective on contemporary research, pointing out blind spots and dead ends in the debate to date, and indicating which avenues of research have the most potential for elucidating our understanding of the interactions between emotion and cognition. We will also welcome contributions that present the most influential contemporary proposals, outlining their strengths and weaknesses in order to provide a taxonomy that helps to map out the current discussion.

 

(b) work that considers the role of emotions in the genesis and interpretation of psychological “pathology”, explicating which conditions should in fact be defined as “pathological” and which might instead be reinterpreted and re-categorized  (as “normalcy”, “anomaly”, “different cognitive style”). In particular, we welcome contributions which offer new interpretive perspectives on emotional dysfunction and the various kinds of therapeutic modalities for the treatment of dysfunction.

 

(c) work that explores neurophysiological aspects of emotional experiences, focusing on the central role of the limbic system in producing the emotional experience that structures the behavior of the individual. Both from a neurobiological and a theoretical-interpretative point of view, the properties of the limbic system have received increasing attention leading to modifications in descriptions of this system in current research. Contributions that provide up to date information on current research and debates in this area are especially welcome.

 

(d) work investigating the connection between morals and emotions, focusing in particular on the links between research in ethics and cognitive neuroscience, which demonstrate that both descriptive and normative theories can and must (or, vice versa, cannot and must not) take into consideration and incorporate  new findings related to the role of brain functions in judgements and behaviors.

 

(e) work in behavioral economics and neuroeconomics that highlights the complementary and/or antagonistic role(s) of emotion and cognition in decision making. Only several decades ago, economics, considered as an autonomous discipline, tended to reduce decision making to a function based on the simple maximization of individual utility.

 

Manuscript preparation and submission

Manuscripts should not exceed 9,000 words (including footnotes) and must be submitted through the online submission procedure available on the journal internet site by September 30th, 2016.

Manuscripts written in Italian or English will be considered for publication. An English abstract of max. 150 words and 5 English key-words must be provided. Please, insert the code “Emotion&Cognition2016” in the box “Communications to the Editor” in the online submission form (step 1). Two separate documents should be submitted. The first document must be anonymous and contain only the manuscript and abstract without any identifying information about the author(s). A second document (called “supplementary file”) must be submitted separately (step 3) and include pictures, tabs, title, abstract, the whole manuscript as well as author(s)’ name, affiliation, e-mail, and surface postal address.

After a preliminary assessment by the Editorial Board, submissions undergo a double–blind peer review process. For instructions on how to prepare the manuscript, click on the link “How to ensure a blind review” available on the internet site. The decision will be communicated to the authors within 6 weeks after submission. After manuscript acceptance, an authors’ guideline will be provided to copyedit the final version of the manuscripts.

For further information please email Andrea Lavazza: lavazza67@gmail.com

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Print
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like Loading...

Archivio notizie

Menu

  • ADMISSION
  • Una testimonianza per il futuro dopo la tragedia del coronavirus
  • GROUPS
    • Classical German Philosophy and Phenomenology
    • Philosophies of Image and Imagination
    • The Philosophy of Nature
    • The quarrel between philosophy and poetry
    • The quarrel between the ancients and moderns
    • Theories of Emotions
    • Utopia, the Political Myth, and Rebellion
  • CONFERENCES
    • 2019
      • Gli spazi e i tempi della forma: storia naturale delle rovine
    • 2018
      • Sellars e la filosofia post-kantiana
    • 2017
      • Dialettica della ragione, teleologia e idea di mondo in Kant.
      • La filosofia e il tragico
      • La leggibilità della natura
    • 2016
      • Dialectic and the Ends of Reason
        • Schedule
      • Il tragico nella letteratura tedesca
    • 2015
      • Immaginazione e Giudizio In Kant
        • Schedule
      • MELANCOLIA. Metamorfosi dell’umor nero
        • Introduction
        • Schedule
      • THE WISDOM OF THE ANCIENTS. The German-Jewish Revaluation of Ancient Philosophy
        • Introduction
        • Schedule
    • 2014
      • Hegel and the phenomenological movement
  • CONTACTS
  • EVENTS
  • IDEAS
  • ODRADEK Journal
  • PEOPLE
  • PRESS REVIEW
  • RICORDANDO BARALE

Zetesis FanPage

Zetesis FanPage

Seguiteci su Twitter

My Tweets

I nostri eventi

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • zetesisproject.com
    • Join 26 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • zetesisproject.com
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: