• Home
  • IDEAS
  • GROUPS
    • Classical German Philosophy and Phenomenology
    • The quarrel between the ancients and moderns
    • The quarrel between philosophy and poetry
    • Theories of Emotions
    • Philosophies of Image and Imagination
    • Utopia, the Political Myth, and Rebellion
    • The Philosophy of Nature
  • EVENTS
  • PEOPLE
  • ADMISSION
  • CONTACTS
  • CONFERENCES
    • 2016
      • Il tragico nella letteratura tedesca
      • Dialectic and the Ends of Reason
        • Schedule
    • 2015
      • CONVEGNO MELANCOLIA
        • Introduction
        • Schedule
      • CONFERENCE ON THE ANCIENTS
        • Introduction
        • Schedule
      • Immaginazione e Giudizio In Kant
        • Schedule
    • 2014
      • Hegel and the phenomenological movement
  • ODRADEK Journal

Author Archives: Stella Ammaturo

“Immaginare l’altrove” Dall’Utopia di Thomas More al Seicento

22 Wednesday Jun 2016

Posted by Stella Ammaturo in suggerimenti eventi

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Albrecht Durer, anti-utopia, Carlo Altini, Doni, Elisabetta Scapparone, Francesco Pucci, Gennaro Maria Barbuto, Giovanni Maria Fara, Gregorio Piaia, John Milton, Katia Senjic, Luisa Brotto, Machiavelli, Maria Assunta Picardi, Marie-Luce Demonet, Maurizio Cambi, Montaigne, Nicola Panichi, Pasquale Terracciano, Pierre Bayle, Rabelais, Saverio Ricci, Simonetta Bassi, Thomas More, Tommaso Campanella, utopia, Valentina Serio, Zuccolo

Vi segnaliamo il convegno su Immaginare l’altrove organizzato da Valentina Serio nell’ambito del progetto PRA 2015 coordinato dalla prof.ssa Bassi.

L’evento si svolgerà martedì 28 e mercoledì 29 giugno presso la Gipsoteca di Arte Antica in p.zza San Paolo all’Orto.

locandina

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Print
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like Loading...

lectio magistralis: Massimo Barale e la filosofia

21 Tuesday Jun 2016

Posted by Stella Ammaturo in suggerimenti eventi

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Claudio La Rocca, filosofia, lectio magistralis, Massimo Barale, ricordo, Università di Pisa

 

Mercoledì 29 giugno 2016
nell’aula Magna del palazzo Matteucci alle ore 16

il prof. Claudio La Rocca

(Università di Genova)

terrà una lectio magistralis su

Massimo Barale e la filosofia

per ricordare la figura di un maestro, collega e amico così importante per la filosofia, per la nostra università, per tutti noi

logo-seminario-filosofia

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Print
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like Loading...

ODRADEK, Vol. I, no. 2: The Quarrel between Poetry and Philosophy

16 Thursday Jun 2016

Posted by Stella Ammaturo in Odradek

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

aesthetics, albert camus, Alessandra Aloisi, Andrew Benjamin, Danilo Manca, David Roochnik, Edoardo Raimondi, Franco D'Intino, Grace Whistler, Leo Strauss, Leopardi, logique de la philosophie, Lorenzo Serini, Marco Menon, Marco Piazza, Nietzsche, novel, Odradek rivista online, Paolo Godani, philosophical self-criticism, Plato, Political Philosophy, quarrel poetry philosophy, reflection, rhetoric, rivista filosofia e letteratura, Walter Benjamin

È con immenso piacere che segnaliamo la pubblicazione del secondo numero della nostra rivista online Odradek sul tema

The Quarrel between Poetry and Philosophy

 

Di seguito trovate l’indice degli articoli con il link diretto alla pagina della rivista.

Vol I, no 2 (2015):
The Quarrel between Poetry and Philosophy,quarrel-poetry-phil-ct
edited by Alessandra Aloisi and Danilo Manca

Table of contents

Introduction
Alessandra Aloisi and Danilo Manca

 

The Quarrel between poetry and philosophy Poetry as Philosophical Self-Criticism
David Roochnik

Leopardi and Plato (Drama and Poetry vs Philosophy)
Franco D’Intino

Furor Divinus: Creatuvity in Plato’s Ion
Andrew Benjamin

From Rhetoric to Reflection: Albert Camus and the «Ancient Quarrel»
Grace Whistler

Where Philosophy Meets Poetry in Nietzsche’s Writings from 1872-1873
Lorenzo Serini

An Unpolitical Political Philosophy? Some Remarks on Leo Strauss’ «Notes on Lucretius»
Marco Menon

Poesia e Filosofia nella Logique de la Philosophie
Edoardo Raimondi

The Individual between Aesthetics and the Novel
Paolo Godani

Walter Benjamin tra redenzione e rammemorazione, via Proust
Marco Piazza

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Print
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like Loading...

Giornata di studi “Lo statuto della coscienza: Fenomenologia e Filosofia della mente”

14 Tuesday Jun 2016

Posted by Stella Ammaturo in incontri, suggerimenti eventi

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Alessandra Fussi, coscienza, Danilo Manca, dottorato in filosofia, esperienza dolore, esperienza soggettiva, fenomenologia, Filieri, Filippo Nobili, filosofia, filosofia della mente, giornata di studi, Giovambattista Bonfiglio, Husserl, Luca Vanzago, Luigi, materialismo, Roberta Lanfredini, Rodolfo Giorgi, scienze empiriche, Silvano Zipoli-Caiani, Stefano Poggi, Università di Firenze, Università di Pisa, Valeria Bizzari

Vi segnaliamo la giornata di studi organizzata dal Dottorato in Filosofia
delle Università di Pisa-Firenze sul tema

Lo statuto della coscienza:
Fenomenologia e Filosofia della mente

l’evento si terrà martedì 21 giugno 2016 a Firenze presso la Sala Conferenze del Dipartimento di Filosofia in via Bolognese, n. 52

Programma della giornata

9:00 Presentazione

9:15 Rodolfo Giorgi (Università di Pisa)
L’esperienza soggettiva: il problema dei qualia

9:45 Silvano Zipoli-Caiani (Università di Firenze)
Quando le affordance spariscono. Due modelli della spiegazione a confronto

10:15 -DISCUSSIONE-

10:45 Break

11:00 Giovambattista Bonfiglio (Università di Pisa)
Materialismo e coscienza

11:30 Luca Vanzago (Università di Pavia)
L’esperienza del dolore: modelli concettuali a confronto

12:00 -DISCUSSIONE-

12:30 Pausa pranzo

_____________________________________________________________________

15:00 Filippo Nobili (Università di Pisa-Firenze)
Genesi della coscienza e conoscenza della genesi: Husserl e la filosofia della mente

15:30 Danilo Manca (Università di Pisa)
La trama della coscienza. Sul modello emergentista della fenomenologia

16:00 Valeria Bizzari (Università di Pisa)
Il problema della coscienza: naturalizzare la fenomenologia o fenomenologizzare le scienze empiriche?

16:30 -DISCUSSIONE-

17:00 Fine lavori

Download programma

COMITATO SCIENTIFICO – ORGANIZZATIVO:
Prof. Stefano Poggi, Prof.ssa Roberta Lanfredini, Prof.ssa Alessandra Fussi, Dott. Luigi Filieri

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Print
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like Loading...

Extended Deadline CFP: “Like a novel”: Crossing Perspectives between Knowing, Story and Digression

22 Sunday May 2016

Posted by Stella Ammaturo in CFA-CFP

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Alessandra Sarchi, Alessandro Cinquegrani, cfp, Davide Bondì, Emmanuelle Danblon, encyclopaedia, fictional way of knowing, History, Knowledge, Matteo Bensi, Matteo Marcheschi, novel, Paolo Rossi, rhetoric, science

CALL FOR PAPER

Like a novel:
crossing perspectives between knowing,
story and digression

New deadline: 15th July 2016.

Editors: Matteo Bensi (matteobensi@gmail.com)
Matteo Marcheschi (marcheschimatteo@gmail.com)

How is it configured and what is nowadays the relationship among novel, story and knowing? What are the conditions, the access paths and starting points of scientific, historical and philosophical research? Which are those of the novel? How are novel and philosophy intertwined, not outwardly but theoretically,? And what about romance and history, novel and epistemological reflection?

The purpose of this issue is to investigate the ways of addressing the problem of the relationship between narration, truth and fiction in the novel, in historical research, in philosophy and in science.

Other questions are the following: What would be the differences between a novel and a scientific paper? What kind of narrative models are available to the historian or to the scientist? What is the cognitive effect for the researcher and for the narrator stemming from the choice of one or the other model?

The problem to be solved is still to find a way to the universal, to a temporary synthesis, hard to get to without recasting the relationship and the interaction between the true, the false and the fiction (Ginzburg, Mazzarella). The path of scientific research is not very different from that of the novelist, littered as it is of false and fake, fragments, traces and spies (Ginzburg); all these elements are all seemingly insignificant details, but they are often able to open new scenarios and perspicuous representations (Wittgenstein), they set generalizations that do not lose the concreteness of their starting point. The universal element to explore appears more similar to the part for the whole than to the whole for one of its parts.

Against such background, the third issue of Odradek aims to question the possibility that the study of the novel, of its means and its techniques, could provide an easy way to answer the questions posed above: if the meta-narration – the auto-reflection of novel itself on its knowing status – it is not only a characteristic of postmodern narrative, but a constitutive element of the novel tout court (Shklovkij, Bachtin), then the possibility of an inquiry on the “novel” as a “a way of knowing” is open.

This call encourages papers focusing on the question of the poetic origin of the novel by adopting a multidisciplinary perspective: at issue will be not only a historical reconstruction of the genesis of the novel, but an investigation into its theoretical value, into the contribution novel gives, can give and has given to philosophical, artistic, historical and scientific knowledge.

Influenced by the Nietzschen genealogical critique of the truth, the 20th century thought has questioned the possibility of a form of human knowledge characterized by clarity and certainty. The boundaries between subject and object, observer and observed object, cause and effect have become blurred. This leads to reaffirm the value of the cognitive processes by analyzing the detriment of their outcome. The 20th-century novel sees the affirmation of metaphors and rhetoric at the expense of rigorous logical argumentation.

In light of this, 20th-century epistemology reflected on the constitutive role of metaphors in scientific thought (T.S. Kuhn) and on that of autobiographical stories in the biological constitution of living (Gould; Bocchi-Ceruti); history, even without coming to the radical conclusions of Metahistory (H. White), has tried to stage the image of its gears, by emphasizing the traits of a study made of detours, blocked roads, prejudices and errors (Ginzburg and Prosperi); fiction revealed its genetic processes, combining and messing up, in the manner of Borges and Calvino.

Moreover, by recognizing themselves in the dizzying analogy of truth and fiction (Diderot), the different fields of knowledge had to deal with what really owns the novel: the power to create knowledge avoiding the coarse mesh of true and false, by ranking instead in terms of what is neither true nor false but plausible (Halliwell).

In this perspective, the novel ceases to be placed on the ground of absolute otherness in comparison to higher knowledge, patching up a wound that the history of philosophy has always sought to heal and, at the same time, to reproduce. Thus, one can bring forward the hypothesis that narration and philosophical inquiry are getting closer when knowledge has made itself rhetorical and logological knowing (Cassin). Such knowing would be human because of its restless, always reversible and temporary, provincial (local) and atmospheric way of being (Ortega y Gasset; Mazzoni), able to catch a glimpse of the universal in the particular (Auerbach).

We feel the philosophical necessity, on the basis of studies of Perelman, Garin and Fumaroli among others, that history and philosophy, science and literature, focus on their possible poetic (Vico) and artisanal (Sennett) origins – plausible and always changing – by investigating their proximity to the novel as a form of knowledge.

Starting from the perhaps fictional nature of human knowledge, we propose to investigate the encyclopaedic character of this knowledge.

In the manner of Sterne’s Tristram Shandy, human knowledge is made of rewritings – translations and betrayals (Kundera) – and narrations that accompany the main story, subverting the order of what is a priority and what is not. Details become a fruitful path of research, now dead end. Nevertheless, they provide a clear picture of a knowledge always referring to something else, .for proximity and morphological distance (Goethe, Wittgenstein). The final result is that the detail, the individual, the fictional, are the only point of view suitable for generalisation.

The topics of the issue may include, but are not limited to:

  1. The origins of the novel: the fictional way of knowing
  2. Novel and History: debts, contamination and epistemological proximity
  3. Fiction and science: a cognitive proximity
  4. Novel and rhetoric: proximity and theoretical distances
  5. Novel and fiction: the work questioning the genre, the genre shining through the work
  6. Knowledge, novel and encyclopaedia
  7. Concept-interpretation and representation (mimesis), the representation-interpretation (mimesis) of the concept
  8. Like a novel: the whole emerging from the detail; or the possibility of telling the general by starting from the particular

 

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Print
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Archivio notizie

Menu

  • ADMISSION
  • Una testimonianza per il futuro dopo la tragedia del coronavirus
  • GROUPS
    • Classical German Philosophy and Phenomenology
    • Philosophies of Image and Imagination
    • The Philosophy of Nature
    • The quarrel between philosophy and poetry
    • The quarrel between the ancients and moderns
    • Theories of Emotions
    • Utopia, the Political Myth, and Rebellion
  • CONFERENCES
    • 2019
      • Gli spazi e i tempi della forma: storia naturale delle rovine
    • 2018
      • Sellars e la filosofia post-kantiana
    • 2017
      • Dialettica della ragione, teleologia e idea di mondo in Kant.
      • La filosofia e il tragico
      • La leggibilità della natura
    • 2016
      • Dialectic and the Ends of Reason
        • Schedule
      • Il tragico nella letteratura tedesca
    • 2015
      • Immaginazione e Giudizio In Kant
        • Schedule
      • MELANCOLIA. Metamorfosi dell’umor nero
        • Introduction
        • Schedule
      • THE WISDOM OF THE ANCIENTS. The German-Jewish Revaluation of Ancient Philosophy
        • Introduction
        • Schedule
    • 2014
      • Hegel and the phenomenological movement
  • CONTACTS
  • EVENTS
  • IDEAS
  • ODRADEK Journal
  • PEOPLE
  • PRESS REVIEW
  • RICORDANDO BARALE

Zetesis FanPage

Zetesis FanPage

Seguiteci su Twitter

My Tweets

I nostri eventi

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • zetesisproject.com
    • Join 1,619 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • zetesisproject.com
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: